WHAT HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ARE SAYING ABOUT GARCINIA

February 12, 2018

There has been a lot of discussion about the new fruit extract known as Garcinia Cambogia used for dietary supplements. There are a lot of reviews about this fruit. There is a review about which garcinia product is the best¬†They have listed this fruit under tropical plants and fruits since it is found as a wild plant species in the region of Southeast Asia. The western part of the world’s element and medicine market has been talking about this for a long time now.

Research centers have spent a lot of money in proving that this dietary supplement has benefits on human as well since they have found benefits in mice when experimented. But they haven’t been succeeded to prove this. Here is one excellent scientific explanation for its failure.

The fat control system in rats and mice has a substance known as citrate lyase which plays a very important role. The same citrate lyase in humans is insufficient in the overall process. This might seem like a very small proof but it is a significant variance result in very minimal positive results versus placebo in humans when double-blind tests were performed.

About how effective Garcinia Cambodia is on the body is still a debate. The Journal of Obesity on December 14th, 2010 stated that “the magnitude of the effect is small, and the clinical relevance is uncertain.”¬† The report further stated that “gastrointestinal adverse events were twice as common in the HCA group compared with placebo in one included study.” The people who participated in this experiment noticed a slight change in weight but gastrointestinal effects were also an issue.

It is difficult to come to a conclusion regarding this because big issue about this is that research centers are performing experiments on animals and not humans. Not only this, some authors do not even bother to reveal which animal was used.